Voters rights are meaningless

Michigan like California voted to ban fag/queer/homosexual people getting married.  If you don't like the words fag or queer, get over it. You people can call me homophobic simply because I know God does not like they way you are living and I agree with Him.  Homosexual people can get away with calling me names, yet I can't refer to you by the terms I heard when I was growing up.  I never call homosexual people the "g" word because that demeans it to me.  Gay to me means jovial or happy, good-spirited, and when I use it that is what I mean.

Marriage is between one man and not one woman.  Not two men or two women.  Or as in one case, I don't know where it was, a woman and her dog!  Which we knew once homosexual "marriages" were allowed would bring.

Voters didn't want to have homosexuals allowed to get married in their states.  Then they bring it to the courts.  Excuse me.  A federal court disallowing what state voters decided.  Take about not following constitutions.  The federal court should not get involved in something that is not causing problems.  A social problem is not a problem for the US.  Oh wait, yes it is, for the democrats.  They need to let the homosexual community know they are behind them.   Only for their votes, but they're too "stupid" to realize this.

Now in Michigan, some of those in the legislation are upset about how much it cost to have the voters decision of not wanting homosexuals to marry in the state overturned.  Um, excuse me.  The voters decided they didn't want homosexuals to be legally married in the state.  Then because a couple of queer women couldn't adopt each others children, mind you I don't know if these women had been married to men, or if they adopted these children or had them artificially inseminated, but because of them, it was decided the law wasn't fair and it went to court.  NOT because the people of Michigan but two women.  I think they should have been given the bill because it was them who were ticked off.  The state had made their wants known already.

Separation of church and state doesn't mean their cannot be copies of the 10 commandments, prayers said at any government building/meeting.  No what that meant was the US government could not begin ONE church/religion and force everyone in the US to become a member of it.  That is what separation of church and state is.  If people who are in their 50's and older would remember what they were taught in school, maybe they'd realize how far off the democrats are.  And how far off the children of today are being taught.

I mean the children of today are being told that both the Korean & Vietnam Conflicts were wars. They were not.  Both of them were conflicts or police actions.  Neither one of them were signed by congress as wars.  Yes men died because they fought, I an not discounting that.  I'm saying children are being taught the wrong things because people are lazy.